About Me

Name: Rainbow10
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

We Fired Pelosi: On to Victory 2012

Our journey has just begun.  Today marks the first day of America’s come back.  You made it possible to celebrate our Republicans victories in the House.  We have a long road ahead of us.  The sprint to 2010 is over.  Now the race turns into a 2012 marathon.  We need to move forward, pace ourselves with a clear strategy, a firm commitment, and the will to win.  There will be times when the climb will be steep and our energy spent.  There will be times when we will be ready to keep going with renewed hope.  There will be times when we will be ready to give up.  We must never give up.

 

The future of our great nation is in peril.  We must remain steady in our determination to preserve and protect our freedoms, our rights, and the legacy of our Founding Fathers. It will not be easy to undo the damage Obama, Reid, and Pelosi inflicted upon our nation.  Domestic policies now in place seek to reshape America in the image of a European social democracy.  Reversing the power grab of the federal government and its intrusiveness upon individual rights will take time.  Conservative Republicans in Congress need to stand firm on principle and need to be accountable to those of us who elected them. 

 

Our responsibility is to remain vigilant.  We need to remind our elected representatives that caving in to special interests or the White House when it comes to implementing fiscal restraint, is not an option.  On foreign policy, we need to remind our elected representatives that we are a nation at war. America’s national interest does not call for apologies or for the approval of the United Nations. It requires the political will to defeat our enemies. Liberal policies aimed at appeasement and negotiation with terrorists and their enablers put America at risk and degrade the courage and sacrifice of our military.

 

It is up to every one of us to reverse the Obama, Reid, and Pelosi agenda.  Barack Obama will continue to place blame on Republicans for “driving the car into the ditch.”  The imagery is powerful, but the excuse is lame. He will use his rhetorical skills to cajole and twist facts to accommodate his political ambitions and his vision for America’s future.  He will fight hard to win a second term.  His reelection campaign starts today.  Our task is to make sure that in 2012, Barack Obama has an opportunity to go back to Chicago, where he can enjoy an early retirement.  If we accomplish this task, America will have a chance to recover.  If we do our job, we will give future generations the gift our Founders bestowed on us: A just government capable of maintaining a strong national defense and a healthy free nation.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fire Pelosi: The Conservative Tsunami

The Fire Pelosi GOP Bus Tour made a stop in my town today.  More than one hundred people showed up to hear Chairman Michael Steele.  His common sense talk energized the crowd.  He asked every one to imagine what the newspaper headlines would read on November 3.  Someone shouted, "America Wins." The crowd cheered. 

Congressional Democrats are poised for defeat. They have worked hard to ignore the will of the American people and have displayed the uttermost arrogance of power by pushing an agenda that puts America at risk of financial collapse. They earned their pink slips. In these last weeks before Election Day, they are bracing for the storm coming their way. So they left Washington.  They are back in their districts campaigning and hoping voters will not notice that they failed to take action to extend tax cuts ending in January. They think Americans are not smart enough to figure out the obvious: an end to tax cuts means a tax increase.

The crowds attending the Fire Pelosi rally in my town and in towns across America know better. They are smart. They are engaged in the political process. They are talking to their neighbors and friends.  They are writing checks to help Republican candidates get elected.  They worry about their kids and grandkids.  They know our  federal debt burden is unsustainable.  They are angry because their elected representatives are no longer accountable. They feel that Washington is out of touch.  They know America is not destined to become a bankrupt Greece. They will vote. They will keep track of those they send to Washington. They are not going back to sit on the sidelines.  They are going to watch and see how Republicans govern.  They will hold Republicans accountable.  

The 2010 election will bring the first conservative waves washing the liberal shores in our nation's Capitol. Republicans elected to Congress in 2010 need to pay close attention to their constituents.
They need to live up to the core Republican values of fiscal restraint. They need to remember who hired them. Republicans need to get back to the business of limited government.  If Republicans do what is right for America, if they lead with the power of their convictions, the waves of 2010 are likely to bring on a conservative tsunami in 2012.  


 

   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Tea Party Movement: The conscience of the GOP?

 

America’s exceptionality is not just a function of its constitutional form of government but is a result of its people.  Our Constitution sets forth the conservative principles of limited government for a just and free nation. Throughout our history, we have witnessed periods of great public engagement in the affairs of our government as well as periods of great apathy.  The role of government in American life caught the attention of Alexis DeTocqueville, who visited the United States in the 1830s. In his epic work, Democracy in America he noted that Americans take a zealous interest in public affairs, because they understand that their prosperity results from their own efforts. Individual responsibility is at the heart of America’s conservatism. 

Conservatism has been a steady presence in American life. Our Founding Fathers designed a perfect union.  Our Republic is a representative democracy, where the conservative principles of liberty, equality, and individual rights guide our relationships with our representatives within local communities, across state lines, and from sea to shining sea.  The Federalist Papers, the most authoritative commentary on our Constitution authored by John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison remind us that those who represent us are clothed with the legitimate authority of the people. From time to time, the American people have taken this authority for granted, but that is not the case in 2010.

Today, Thomas Paine’s words ring true: “These are the times that try men’s souls.”  In times like these, common sense Americans show up at the public square.  In response to out of control federal spending, the Tea Party movement is voicing America’s deep conservative values of limited government, free markets, and fiscal responsibility.  This movement consists mostly of first-time activists who are challenging elected officials in both the Democratic and Republican Parties to reign in spending and get back to the basic values enshrined in our Constitution.

In a recent Wall Street Journal article, Karl Rove suggests that the Tea Party movement will be more effective if it remains separate from the two major political parties.  He argues that by remaining independent, the Tea Party movement can exert greater influence on both Democrat and Republican candidates.  I agree with Rove.  However, I offer a word of caution. The Tea Party can defeat its own objectives by misinterpreting Rove’s prescription. If remaining independent translates into becoming a third party, the Tea Party is capable of peeling away support from conservative Republicans in this year’s congressional elections. This will mirror the effect of Ross Perot during the 1992 presidential election.  Perot sealed Bill Clinton’s victory. 

A separate but influential Tea Party, unmoved by the lure of grabbing the limelight as a third party can make a valuable contribution to the future of our nation.  While maintaining the stable power balance resulting from our two-party system, the Tea Party can serve as the conscience of the Republican Party. The Tea Party should not merge with the GOP.  The Tea Party can be the little voice that reminds Republicans of the direction in which their own moral compass should point.

Conservative Republicans will listen attentively to the little voice, because their values are the same as those of their common sense Tea Party counterparts. Conservative Republicans and Tea Party activists complement one another. The Tea Party movement working in unison with the Republican Party can help defeat the false promises of liberalism.  This is the right thing to do for America. This is the right thing to do to preserve our perfect union and give the next generation a more secure and prosperous future.     

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Pessimist in Chief

During the first Gulf War, Margaret Thatcher told George Bush (41):" George, this is no time to go wobbly."  House Republicans and a large majority of Senate Republicans have stood firm in opposition to a massive spending bill.  They did not go wobbly.  Senators Collins, Snowe, and Specter should follow the Iron Lady's counsel.  These liberal East Coast Republicans have fallen for Obama's gloom and doom predictions: If we fail to burden the American taxpayer with another Keynesian calamity, our economy and our way of life will collapse.  

The president, his minions, and his fellow travelers in Congress are painting a false picture.  We are not facing an imminent catastrophe if the partisan spending bill fails to see the light of day. This bill was cooked up in the House, rejected by Republicans, and is now pushed as a "moderate" compromise by a lame coalition of Senate Democrats and a trio of Republican liberals.  It does not represent "change" we can believe in.  This is a tired, liberal solution we know  well.  In fact,
there is ample historical precedent  to prove that our current economic woes will be aggravated by  massive domestic social spending that fails to create jobs, stimulate private investment, and build confidence in our public institutions and private markets.
 
The politics of angst are not helpful in times like these. This is when we need competent leadership able to understand economic realities and implement sound policies. The gloom and doom message by a president that relies on fear to get our economy moving again is counterproductive.  Such a message does not instill confidence.  It gives an uneasy feeling that a new administration filled with old faces is muddling through with little knowledge or care as to the unintended consequences of a reckless spending plan, which they did not even write.  Of course, delegating the writing of the "stimulus" package to House Democrats is a blessing in disguise. It can serve to blame them for the blowback down the line.  In a twist of fate, this would give the White House a chance to exercise true bipartisanship after the 2010 congressional elections, when a revived Republican Party comes roaring back.

The opportunity to show America true leadership and true solutions is the silver lining we conservatives must now focus on. While  the Pessimist in Chief paints the gloomy future that awaits us as we near the proverbial cliff, Republicans in Congress and conservatives across the nation need to remind America that our best days are still ahead. We should trust our own ability to achieve our dreams through our own efforts rather than through government handouts.  We should have confidence in our ability to spend, invest, and save rather than having a command and control state dictate our economic choices.  

America was founded on conservative principles and a tradition of forward-looking optimism.  Pessimism is an integral part of the false promise of liberalism. It fuels the fires of the Nanny State intent on creating a culture of dependence and entitlement.  Passage of the so called "stimulus plan" will mark the first installment of Obama's socialist utopia.  Indeed, the time to act is now.  We must continue to oppose this bill.  It is no time for conservatives to go wobbly.                 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pay Attention to Biden's "Rhetorical Flourishes"

  Dear Fellow Voter,

In a few days, we will be making a most important decision. We will elect to public office those we trust to make choices on our behalf and in the best interest of our state and nation. It is time to turn off the TV and computer, stop listening to pollsters and political pundits. It is time to walk away from all the political chatter. It is time to sit back and reflect on our responsibility as Election Day approaches.

Last evening, I got back to basics and looked up the president’s job description in our Constitution. Simply stated under Article II, section 2, his first responsibility is that of Commander in Chief. The Founders believed this was to be his most important responsibility. The Founders then went on to delineate the president’s power to make treaties and appoint judges to the Supreme Court and make other public appointments with the advice and consent of the Senate. 

Reading the president’s job description helped me clarify a number of important issues. This election boils down to two interrelated issues, national security and the economy, but my final decision has little to do with either one. Our next president will have to live by Harry Truman’s famous words: “The buck stops here.” He will not share the office with anyone else. He will not have time for on-the-job training. He will not be able to make decisions while holding a rally with thousands of adoring fans. He will not be able to come to your neighborhood for a town hall meeting and ask for your advice when a crisis lands on his desk. He will have many advisors whispering in his ear, but he alone will have to make decisions. His character, judgment, and experience will determine how well he gets the job done.

In their infinite wisdom, our Founders assigned our Commander in Chief the job of preserving, protecting, and defending America against its enemies as a primary duty. Nowhere in our Constitution did I find a single mention of presidential powers to “spread the wealth around.” Without a strong national security, our economic problems will pale in comparison to the hardships we will endure.   The reason I bring this up has to do with Joe Biden’s latest “rhetorical flourish.” You see, Senator Obama’s running mate reminded us that the junior Senator from Illinois is a novice in foreign affairs, who will be vulnerable as president and who will be tested during a “world crisis” within his first six months in office. This is very unsettling.

I made my decision. We need a president who will inspire us through his courage and commitment to achieve greatness at home and abroad, a Commander in Chief who will defend America and lead her to a more secure and prosperous future. We need someone who believes that America’s best days are still ahead. I am voting for John McCain.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Perils of Trade Talks

China's Olympic Games are making headlines, but China's recent trade actions get little media attention. It comes as no surprise to find out that China sided with developing countries when it came to trade talks.  There was much movement but little movement forward during the latest trade negotiations of the WTO in Geneva.  China cast the deciding swing vote in favor of India's position, and its action suggests that politics trumped economic common sense.  China's move will limit opportunities for Chinese exports to developed markets. Instead, by expanding its political ties to India and other developing nations, China built political capital that will come in handy to meet its strategic interests . 

One is left to wonder what motivates China's behavior, particularly in light of the fact that its economic interests are closely tied to its main export markets in  the US and other developed nations.  Of particular interest are China's increasing efforts to strengthen ties with the least-developed nations, many of which are failed states in Africa, and other strategic regions such as Central Asia, and the Middle East.  These are the nations which have vast natural resources and where unstable political regimes reign supreme.  Could it be that China is seeking to align its political interests with those nations that have the least to offer in terms of export markets but the most in terms of oil reserves and other natural resources?  After all, the US market is  already open to Chinese products, but it  is showing signs of a slowdown as the US economy struggles with higher energy prices, a slumping real estate market, and massive government debt.  So, it seems possible that China is willing to trade-off short- term loss of cooperation with the US and other developed nations for a long- term gain, namely a competitive position to access and control energy resources around the world.

We need to keep close tabs on China, because trade talks are no longer confined to the rarified atmosphere of the WTO.  Global trade and energy are interdependent. China has made this very clear with its recent action to split the world into the "haves and the have-nots."  The failure of the trade talks should serve as a wake-up call to all Americans.  A trade and energy alliance between China and India will carry a big price tag for the US.  Thus, energy independence including offshore drilling, clean coal, nuclear, wind and solar solutions are absolutely necessary for America to remain competitive, prosperous, and secure in the 21st century.  In my recent political novel, Troutfly, I made up a fictional relationship between extremist elements in China and India.  The facts in Geneva point to the perils of trade talks.  Let's hope that an understanding of what is at stake, can keep fiction from turning into reality.        
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »