About Me

Name: Rainbow10
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama: Pessimist in Chief

During the first Gulf War, Margaret Thatcher told George Bush (41):" George, this is no time to go wobbly."  House Republicans and a large majority of Senate Republicans have stood firm in opposition to a massive spending bill.  They did not go wobbly.  Senators Collins, Snowe, and Specter should follow the Iron Lady's counsel.  These liberal East Coast Republicans have fallen for Obama's gloom and doom predictions: If we fail to burden the American taxpayer with another Keynesian calamity, our economy and our way of life will collapse.  

The president, his minions, and his fellow travelers in Congress are painting a false picture.  We are not facing an imminent catastrophe if the partisan spending bill fails to see the light of day. This bill was cooked up in the House, rejected by Republicans, and is now pushed as a "moderate" compromise by a lame coalition of Senate Democrats and a trio of Republican liberals.  It does not represent "change" we can believe in.  This is a tired, liberal solution we know  well.  In fact,
there is ample historical precedent  to prove that our current economic woes will be aggravated by  massive domestic social spending that fails to create jobs, stimulate private investment, and build confidence in our public institutions and private markets.
 
The politics of angst are not helpful in times like these. This is when we need competent leadership able to understand economic realities and implement sound policies. The gloom and doom message by a president that relies on fear to get our economy moving again is counterproductive.  Such a message does not instill confidence.  It gives an uneasy feeling that a new administration filled with old faces is muddling through with little knowledge or care as to the unintended consequences of a reckless spending plan, which they did not even write.  Of course, delegating the writing of the "stimulus" package to House Democrats is a blessing in disguise. It can serve to blame them for the blowback down the line.  In a twist of fate, this would give the White House a chance to exercise true bipartisanship after the 2010 congressional elections, when a revived Republican Party comes roaring back.

The opportunity to show America true leadership and true solutions is the silver lining we conservatives must now focus on. While  the Pessimist in Chief paints the gloomy future that awaits us as we near the proverbial cliff, Republicans in Congress and conservatives across the nation need to remind America that our best days are still ahead. We should trust our own ability to achieve our dreams through our own efforts rather than through government handouts.  We should have confidence in our ability to spend, invest, and save rather than having a command and control state dictate our economic choices.  

America was founded on conservative principles and a tradition of forward-looking optimism.  Pessimism is an integral part of the false promise of liberalism. It fuels the fires of the Nanny State intent on creating a culture of dependence and entitlement.  Passage of the so called "stimulus plan" will mark the first installment of Obama's socialist utopia.  Indeed, the time to act is now.  We must continue to oppose this bill.  It is no time for conservatives to go wobbly.                 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pay Attention to Biden's "Rhetorical Flourishes"

  Dear Fellow Voter,

In a few days, we will be making a most important decision. We will elect to public office those we trust to make choices on our behalf and in the best interest of our state and nation. It is time to turn off the TV and computer, stop listening to pollsters and political pundits. It is time to walk away from all the political chatter. It is time to sit back and reflect on our responsibility as Election Day approaches.

Last evening, I got back to basics and looked up the president’s job description in our Constitution. Simply stated under Article II, section 2, his first responsibility is that of Commander in Chief. The Founders believed this was to be his most important responsibility. The Founders then went on to delineate the president’s power to make treaties and appoint judges to the Supreme Court and make other public appointments with the advice and consent of the Senate. 

Reading the president’s job description helped me clarify a number of important issues. This election boils down to two interrelated issues, national security and the economy, but my final decision has little to do with either one. Our next president will have to live by Harry Truman’s famous words: “The buck stops here.” He will not share the office with anyone else. He will not have time for on-the-job training. He will not be able to make decisions while holding a rally with thousands of adoring fans. He will not be able to come to your neighborhood for a town hall meeting and ask for your advice when a crisis lands on his desk. He will have many advisors whispering in his ear, but he alone will have to make decisions. His character, judgment, and experience will determine how well he gets the job done.

In their infinite wisdom, our Founders assigned our Commander in Chief the job of preserving, protecting, and defending America against its enemies as a primary duty. Nowhere in our Constitution did I find a single mention of presidential powers to “spread the wealth around.” Without a strong national security, our economic problems will pale in comparison to the hardships we will endure.   The reason I bring this up has to do with Joe Biden’s latest “rhetorical flourish.” You see, Senator Obama’s running mate reminded us that the junior Senator from Illinois is a novice in foreign affairs, who will be vulnerable as president and who will be tested during a “world crisis” within his first six months in office. This is very unsettling.

I made my decision. We need a president who will inspire us through his courage and commitment to achieve greatness at home and abroad, a Commander in Chief who will defend America and lead her to a more secure and prosperous future. We need someone who believes that America’s best days are still ahead. I am voting for John McCain.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Perils of Trade Talks

China's Olympic Games are making headlines, but China's recent trade actions get little media attention. It comes as no surprise to find out that China sided with developing countries when it came to trade talks.  There was much movement but little movement forward during the latest trade negotiations of the WTO in Geneva.  China cast the deciding swing vote in favor of India's position, and its action suggests that politics trumped economic common sense.  China's move will limit opportunities for Chinese exports to developed markets. Instead, by expanding its political ties to India and other developing nations, China built political capital that will come in handy to meet its strategic interests . 

One is left to wonder what motivates China's behavior, particularly in light of the fact that its economic interests are closely tied to its main export markets in  the US and other developed nations.  Of particular interest are China's increasing efforts to strengthen ties with the least-developed nations, many of which are failed states in Africa, and other strategic regions such as Central Asia, and the Middle East.  These are the nations which have vast natural resources and where unstable political regimes reign supreme.  Could it be that China is seeking to align its political interests with those nations that have the least to offer in terms of export markets but the most in terms of oil reserves and other natural resources?  After all, the US market is  already open to Chinese products, but it  is showing signs of a slowdown as the US economy struggles with higher energy prices, a slumping real estate market, and massive government debt.  So, it seems possible that China is willing to trade-off short- term loss of cooperation with the US and other developed nations for a long- term gain, namely a competitive position to access and control energy resources around the world.

We need to keep close tabs on China, because trade talks are no longer confined to the rarified atmosphere of the WTO.  Global trade and energy are interdependent. China has made this very clear with its recent action to split the world into the "haves and the have-nots."  The failure of the trade talks should serve as a wake-up call to all Americans.  A trade and energy alliance between China and India will carry a big price tag for the US.  Thus, energy independence including offshore drilling, clean coal, nuclear, wind and solar solutions are absolutely necessary for America to remain competitive, prosperous, and secure in the 21st century.  In my recent political novel, Troutfly, I made up a fictional relationship between extremist elements in China and India.  The facts in Geneva point to the perils of trade talks.  Let's hope that an understanding of what is at stake, can keep fiction from turning into reality.        
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »